Need confidence in multi-tenant isolation?
When one customer can see another customer’s data, the business impact is immediate and severe.
Multi-tenant risk is usually not a single route bug. It often appears in role logic, background jobs, exports, support tooling, APIs, and edge-case flows where tenant assumptions are weaker than expected.
Tenant isolation failures depend on how a product models accounts, roles, support actions, and business rules. That context is exactly what scanners are weakest at understanding.
What it usually means
- Cross-tenant data access through IDOR or authz failures
- Support or admin tooling that crosses tenant boundaries unsafely
- Exports, reporting, and background processes leaking the wrong data set
What Raijuna would test
- Tenant boundary enforcement across UI and API paths
- Role and support-tool privilege separation
- High-value data flows like exports, billing, admin actions, and reporting
Use the scoping wizard from this problem page
If this pain point matches what worries your team, the wizard can translate it into the most sensible next engagement before you contact Raijuna.
Answer a few short questions and get a suggested engagement path with the right next step.
Is multi-tenant testing just another name for IDOR testing?
No. IDOR is one common expression of the problem, but tenant-isolation review also covers roles, support tools, exports, and the places where business rules cross customer boundaries indirectly.
Should we test support and admin tooling too?
Yes. Some of the most damaging tenant leaks appear in privileged tooling and internal workflows rather than only in the customer-facing product.
Scope a tenant-isolation review
If this problem is already live in your product or blocking a launch, move into scoping with context attached instead of waiting for a generic review request.
Scope a tenant-isolation review